Ban
Plastic in Small Businesses, Foodservice & Retail
It’s probably the loudest and most forceful rallying cry in commerce
and modern society.
Ban plastic in businesses, foodservice, retail and your homes.
That includes, straws, utensils, plates, cups, lids, bags, bottles
and other objects made from non-renewable sources.
Will that create a better world? Perhaps. But don’t bet against
it. Savvy business owners are at least listening because the person walking
through the door is insisting on it.
Here are some generally accepted reasons for banning plastic bags
and other plastic objects:
1.
Plastic bags do not
only pollute our water but also our land.
Plastic bags are usually lightweight and can travel very long distances by
either water or wind. Wind blows these plastic bags and trashes a whole area. This
litter gets caught up in between trees, fences and floats in water bodies and
moves to the oceans.
2.
The plastic bags
are made from non-renewable sources and contribute to climate change. Most of plastic is made of polypropylene
which is a material manufactured from petroleum and natural gas. All of the
materials are non-renewable fossil fuel-based materials and through their
extraction and even production, greenhouse gases are created which further
contribute to global climate change.
3.
A lot of energy
is used to produce these bags. The
total amount of energy required to drive a car for one kilometer or 0.5 miles
is the equivalent energy required to produce nine plastic bags. It is not rational
that these non-renewable resources are used to make plastic bags
when the typical useful life of each and every plastic bag is around 12 minutes.
4.
Plastic bags do
not degrade. In truth,
petroleum based plastic bags never degrade. Instead of the plastic degrading,
it is broken down into small tiny pieces which end up in the oceans and are
then consumed by wildlife. Currently, there are some 46,000-1
million plastic fragments floating within every square mile of the globes
oceans.
5.
Plastic bags are
harmful to wildlife and marine life.
Birds, animals and marine life such as sea turtles and fish often mistake the
plastic bag and other plastic materials for food and consume them. What happens
once they consume these plastic materials is that their digestive system gets congested
leading to the development of health infections and death when there is
suffocation. The animals may also become easily entangled inside the plastic.
6.
Plastic bags are
harmful to human health. There are some
chemicals from the plastic bags which can disrupt the normal functioning of
hormones in the body. Most plastic fragments in the oceans like plastic bags
have some pollutants such as PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyl) together with PAHs
(Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) which are hormone disrupting. Once the
marine animals consume these chemicals, they move through the food web then later into the humans who consume fish
together with other marine animals. The chemical materials bio-accumulates in
the sea animals and fish system as they are exposed to them in the ocean
waters. When the humans prepare them they consume all these chemicals affecting
their health. They could develop cancers or other serious conditions.
7.
Plastic bags are
expensive and hard to clean or remove from the environment. The amount of plastic bag cleanup is around
17 cents per bag thus in average the taxpayers end up paying around $88 each
year just on plastic bag waste. These plastic bags also cost 3-5 cents
each. Thus, the plastic considered free is not free after all. Individuals pay
a lot to purchase them and even for reusing them. For this reason, plastics
should simply be banned.
8.
Plastic bags have
external costs. Several costs
are attributed to the production of plastic bags. A prime example is the
production and environmental costs.
9.
Plastic bags are
not easy to recycle. Plastic bags
are said to present significant challenge in terms of recycling. Recycling
facilities do not have the capacity to recycle plastic bags and thus do not
accept them. Therefore, the actual recycling rate for plastic bags is around
5%.
10.
Plastic bags tend
to last more; perhaps forever and we even use so many of them. Plastic bags never degrade completely so the
more the amount of plastic bags the more there is plastic pollution and its effects. Banning the use of plastic
bags will help reduce this great effect.
11.
Even if we did
decide to recycle plastic bags, these materials still end up in oceans and
landfills. Recycling
the plastic bags does not affect the fact that they will still be dumped into the environment and end up into either landfills or oceans. These recycled plastic bags are not
degradable and cause the same effects as non-recycled plastic bags.
12.
These plastic
bags are impacting the environment negatively by making the Great Pacific
garbage patch bigger every minute.
Most of the plastic materials once released into the environment find their way
into waterways and once they are there they dumped into oceans. Great Pacific
Ocean is one such area negatively affected with all the plastic material. The
more they are thrown into the oceans the more they increase causing the garbage patch to increase in size.
13.
Bans should be
adopted because they are greatly effective at reducing plastic big waste. China banned plastic bags and four years
later, the amount of plastic bags thrown into the environment had reduced by 40
billion. If the US bans plastic bags, there would be fewer landfills.
14.
Plastic bags don’t
keep our streets clean. Most of our
cities are not clean because people don’t care to know where they throw their
garbage. They do it in water bodies, streets and in the landfills. These wastes litter our streets making them look
ugly affecting their aesthetic value.
15.
It helps spread
awareness. When we ban
plastic bags, we keep our environment clean and at the same time send some message
globally about the importance of environment protection. People learn that banning plastic is
for a reason and they can take up such important information. They can
subsequently begin to understand that the plastic causes some negative effects
and the environment and humans need protection against them.
16.
With a ban on
plastic bags, there would be improved technology which would boost other
businesses. With such a
ban, the society would be required to produce some more sophisticated bags. A
great manpower will be required by the manufacturing factories so they can
make eco-friendly and greener materials.
17.
Banning plastic
bags helps save money. These plastics
cost a lot of money because the final costs account for the total production
costs from their manufacture using petroleum to when they will be thrown away.
18.
People are ready
for the ban and thus, it should be adopted.
People have seen how much the plastic bags have adverse effects on their
health’s and environment and thus, they have desired and opted for change. This
change is the use of eco-friendly materials.
19.
Through banning
plastic bags, the people will learn to support local workers together with
green industries.
20.
People can opt
for manufacturing reusable bags so that they create products which are
sustainable.
Manufacturing reusable bags will create new job opportunities in
terms of green manufacturing, research and processing of packaging products.
21.
Other nations are
banning the use of plastic because they have noticed that it is causing harm to the environment and human health. Currently, over 40 nations together with
municipalities around the globe have instituted plastic bag bans. Other nations
should follow suit to reduce the overall environmental implications.
22.
UN Environment
Program secretariat has recommended a ban on all plastic bags worldwide. This means there are a thousand and one
reasons for the ban of plastic bags. If some governments cannot ban them
completely, then they can make the people pay heftily for using plastic bags to
discourage its usage.
23.
Through the
banning of plastic, cities in various nations can begin to focus on other
bigger waste diversion challenges.
Cities have had set targets that they are supposed to achieve like in Toronto,
Canada where the city council is required to achieve 70% waste diversion by
2010. People cannot achieve the set target because most households do not have
green bins. If there is plastic bag bans then city council can place their
focus and attention on getting green bins to various apartment buildings and
then meeting waste diversion targets.
Recently, USA Today
reported that Marriott Hotels will
be eliminating
plastic straws from its 6,500 hotels within the next year. This is a
big deal not only because of the sheer scale of the ban – it will reportedly
eliminate 1 billion plastic straws and a quarter-billion stirrers annually – or
the fact that hotels are kind of a ground zero for beverage consumption, but
also because an awful lot of these properties will be in beachfront locations
and/or other areas of natural beauty.
Whole
Foods Market is displaying a sign in its supermarkets that says no straws at
all – plastic or paper – unless you request one.
Wegmans plans to reduce in-store plastic made from fossil fuels by 2
million pounds this year and seeks to eliminate 10 million pounds by 2024. The
supermarket chain is targeting packaging and other single-use plastics. So far
in 2019, Wegmans reports replacing plastic straws and drink stirrers with
renewable fiber alternatives at all of their corporate work sites and 98 stores
in New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Virginia, Maryland and Massachusetts.
To help reach its goal for this
year, the company is collaborating with the Center for Sustainable Packaging at
Rochester Institute of Technology to identify alternatives. Wegmans anticipates
replacing some current packaging with materials made from plant-based renewable
fiber, the company says.
Carlsberg beer
cans are to be stuck together with glue as it becomes one of the first brewers
to abandon plastic rings. The Danish brewer said the move, which has been
heralded as a world-first, to attach its multi-packs with adhesive will reduce
the use of plastic to package products by 75%.
After a three-year development
process, Carlsberg insists the dots of glue bonding its new “Snap
Packs” are strong enough to withstand journeys from shelves to homes, yet
sufficiently brittle to break when twisted. The eco-friendly packaging
innovation will debut in Great Britain, where 30% of Carlsberg’s beer
output is drunk every year.
In the mecca of shopping in northeast New Jersey, Paramus, you won’t get plastic bogs for
your merchandise if a proposal to ban plastic bags is approved by the
borough. The Borough Council introduced the ordinance last week that
will ban plastic bags and Styrofoam from every store and restaurant,
including the borough’s four major malls. The final draft of the ordinance
will be tweaked with input from the Paramus Environmental Commission in the coming
days.
Paramus is a significant trophy in the effort to broadly ban
plastic bags, says Jennifer Coffey, executive director of the Association of New Jersey Environmental
Commissions.
“This is something that is not only possible, but achievable now,”
Coffey was quoted as saying. “It’s not something you have to wait to do in the
future. It makes a huge difference in for our quality of life and ecosystem.”
Approximately 4.5 billion plastic bags and other products are
given to New Jersey shoppers each year. Since the Garden State Plaza was ranked the ninth most lucrative mall in
the nation last year by CNBC, with $950 worth of sales per square feet, the
impact of removing plastic bags from these retailers could be considerable.
Paramus is home to hundreds of large retailers, including Target and Kohl’s,
REI and Bed Bath & Beyond as well as pricey brands.
The Bergen County town won’t be the first municipality with a
large retail presence to ban plastic bags: Seattle, Chicago, and all of
California have bans in place. Locally, Jersey City and Hoboken have enacted
plastic bag bans. New York’s ban is also on the list for next year.
Maine Gov.
Janet Mills signed legislation recently that made the state the first to ban
businesses from selling or distributing products made of Styrofoam, also known
as polystyrene foam.
“Polystyrene cannot be recycled like a lot of other products, so
while that cup of coffee may be finished, the Styrofoam cup it was in is not,”
Mills was quoted as saying in a statement, according to The Boston Herald.
“In fact, it will be around for decades to come and eventually it will break
down into particles, polluting our environment, hurting our wildlife, and even
detrimentally impacting our economy,” she said.
More than 256 million pieces of disposable foam cups, plates,
bowls, platters and trays are used every year in Maine, the Natural Resources
Council of Maine said in a news release after Mills, a Democrat,
signed the bill. Businesses, including restaurants and grocery stores, will
have to switch to eco-friendly alternatives.
ALDI US, a chain
with more than 1,800 US stores in 35 states – including five in the Garden
State – that serves more than 40 million customers each month, has announced
new commitments to plastic packaging reduction.
According to its press statement, the company is uniquely
positioned to influence how its products are sourced, produced and brought to
shelves because more than 90% of the store’s range is ALDI-exclusive. The
company plans to reach the following set of goals by working with its
suppliers:
• By 2025, 100% of ALDI packaging, including plastic packaging,
will have reusable, recyclable or compostable packaging;
• By 2025, packaging material of all ALDI-exclusive products to be
reduced by at least 15%;
• By 2020, 100% of ALDI-exclusive consumable packaging to include
How2Recycle label;
• By 2020, implement an initiative to make private-label product
packaging easier for customers to reuse;
• Guide continuous improvement of product packaging by internal
expertise and external evaluations.
Greenpeace Senior
Oceans Campaigner David Pinsky observed, “ALDI US is taking steps in
the right direction by acknowledging its role in the plastic pollution crisis,
and beginning to embrace reduction and reuse. The company has already taken
positive steps by never offering single-use plastic grocery bags, ensuring they
are kept out of landfills and our oceans.”
To further reduce the amount of foodservice packaging that ends up
as waste, restaurants have been
urged to make sure they’re purchasing recyclable materials and disposing of
them properly. A high percentage of restaurant operators report that they
recycle, according to the National
Restaurant Association’s 2017 Restaurant Sustainability Survey, which found
that 29% of restaurants recycle rigid plastics such as cups, some 22% recycle
cling wrap and other flexible plastics, and 65% recycle paper and cardboard.
Placing clearly labeled bins and instructions on signage or even
the packaging itself can help encourage diners to put their used containers and
utensils in the right place when they’re finished. However, differences in
recycling capabilities from place to place can make this a more difficult
proposition for restaurants with multiple locations.
Recycling and composting is still very much a local issue, so
while you may be able to recycle your paper cups in one town you may not do it
in the neighboring community. There may not be a national message about
recycling but certainly from a local standpoint that’s a little easier.
This growing movement of packaging and utensils being taken out of
the restaurant has driven more operators to consider the full life cycle of
foodservice packaging. Recycling and composting packages at the end of their
life can help reduce waste, but buying packages made from more sustainable
materials also has a positive impact on the environment that isn’t dependent on
what customers do with the package once they leave the restaurant.
Nearly three in four restaurateurs said they buy at least some
packaging and supplies that contain recycled materials, the National Restaurant
Association survey found. There’s a wide variety of sustainable packaging and
utensils on the market, and operators should “talk to their suppliers about
what’s available to them,” advised Laura Abshire, the NRA’s director of
sustainability policy and government affairs.
Operators should also talk with distributors and other suppliers
about products that they’d like to see offered, and give feedback on how
products could be improved. Making sure product performance doesn’t suffer as
sustainability improves is key for restaurants, where customer experience is
paramount.
The way this campaign has evolved has made the merchant’s opinion
almost irrelevant. What is important is that the notion of banning plastic
exists and it has attracted a significant number of consumers as passionate adherents
– and those consumers, their customers, are adamant about banning plastic and
sustainability.
Most people are choosing companies that take a stand on important
social, cultural, environmental and political issues, according to
an online survey of nearly 30,000 consumers by Accenture Strategy, conducted
across 35 countries between August and October 2018.
From compostable doggy poo bags and bamboo toothbrushes to plastic
bag bans and electric cars, businesses are standing up to the challenge as
consumers flex their wallets. The study found that nearly two-thirds of
consumers prefer to buy goods and services from companies whose values align
with theirs.
Specifically, more than 60%
of respondents said they gravitate towards businesses committed to reducing
plastics and improving the environment. Half of those surveyed said they prefer
companies that stand up for societal and cultural issues and related causes –
not just paying lip service to those causes; authenticity is also highly
valued.
Three quarters said they like companies that use high quality
ingredients, while more than 60% said they favor businesses that are
transparent and treat employees well.
And consumers are ditching
businesses that don’t make the grade. Nearly half said they have boycotted
companies as a result of those organizations’ actions, and two-thirds believe
that refusing to buy a company’s product or complaining on social media can
impact how firms behave.
Consumers’ push on businesses is sparking attention in the
boardrooms. After all, why should a business – small or otherwise – not heed
what the customers’ wants? If the consumers want sustainability, they’ll get
it. It consumers don’t want to see plastic, they won’t see it.
Consequently, it’s not smart to reject customer preferences.
“The truth is that sustainable
business is good business. Report after report provides irrefutable
evidence that companies delivering total value for people, planet and profit
significantly outperform their competitors and deliver higher margins. The
economic value of sustainable business has now come to the attention of
investors and asset managers. Investors are increasingly demanding information
on the Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) impacts of their investments.
BlackRock, for example, established a range of sustainable exchange-traded
funds (ETFs) last year in response to this demand,” noted Lise Kingo, CEO and executive director of UN
Global Compact.
And finally for those business owners who are still too
stubborn to recognize what’s good for their cash registers, Richard Kestenbaum, co-founder and partner at Triangle Capital
LLC, summarized: “I’m not saying that’s a bad thing or a good thing — the
important point here is: smart retail brands who want to do good business will
listen to their environmentally-sensitive consumers and market their products
accordingly.”
In New Jersey, visit the Small Business Development Centers (NJSBDC) or the New Jersey Sustainable Business Registry
(or your state’s ASBDC center) about
becoming sustainable, helping the planet and growing your business.
No comments:
Post a Comment